Cloud-based access control has come a long way since its first introduction in the early 2010s. Since then, the technology has evolved rapidly with more and more companies entering the market and offering increasingly robust solutions. When it comes to selecting an access control solution, two manufacturers in particular stand out, ProdataKey (PDK) and Alarm.com. Both initially found their customer base in small-to-medium sized businesses, but have since expanded their features to cater to enterprise-level operations. This article compares these two solutions to help integrators and end-users understand which might be the best fit for their needs.
Overview: ProdataKey (PDK)
ProdataKey (PDK) is well-known for its innovative cloud-based access control systems, offering standout ease of use, security features, and seamless 3rd-party integrations. PDK was developed with a complete mobile-first approach, delivering convenient access and management from any smartphone or tablet. The ProdataKey mobile app allows users to control doors, manage credentials, and monitor activity from anywhere, providing ultimate flexibility. By focusing on mobile-use, PDK gives users the power of access control in their hands.
Overview: Alarm.com
Alarm.com’s access control is part of a broader platform that integrates security, video management, and home automation. Alarm.com access control systems support industry-standard hardware like Mercury and HID controllers, and it offers a range of reader technologies. The platform’s Enterprise Dashboard provides centralized management across multiple locations, customizable user permissions, and real-time reporting. Alarm.com’s integrated solution ramps up security and reduces false alarms with automated rules and alerts.
Mobile Access
ProdataKey
PDK pioneered mobile-first access control. The company offers a seamless mobile experience with the ProdataKey app, available on iOS and Android, allowing users to unlock doors, manage access, monitor activity, and receive notifications from anywhere. On the integrator-facing side, they can use the same mobile app to automatically discover and configure new devices eliminating the need for an on-site computer and saving significant time on installation ProdataKey also offers Bluetooth mobile credentials compatible with PDK Red High-Security Readers and Touch io Readers for convenient, hands-free access.
Alarm.com’s solution utilizes Bluetooth and NFC for mobile credentials, compatible with Android and iOS smart devices. Like PDK, users can remotely control door locks and manage access from the Alarm.com app. Mobile credentials are compatible with the company’s line of readers, including ET10, ET20, and ET25 models. Mobile credentials are particularly important for applications such as gyms and residential communities who need seamless access but may have a higher turnover rate of users.
Pricing Models
ProdataKey
ProdataKey is well-known for its competitive pricing and excellent value, especially considering the sophisticated features and scalability. For most applications, the total cost of the system, including hardware, cloud service, and mobile credentials, will be the lowest compared to other competitors, making it an attractive option for any business. PDK also has a diverse controller lineup, allowing customers to incrementally increase the size of their systems overtime. Lastly, PDK strongly emphasizes that it only sells through distribution channels, and never to end-users. The company has strong MSRP control, prioritizing the success of their dealer partners.
Alarm.com
Like ProdataKey, Alarm.com operates on a recurring monthly subscription model, charging monthly fee for cloud hosting, though the total system cost can vary significantly based on feature-set and integrations. Similar to PDK’s Partner Program, Alarm.com’s pricing strategy includes volume-based discounts for dealers. While Alarm.com operates with a similar pricing model to PDK, there have been some reports of lack of MSRP control which can risk undermining dealer margins.
System Integrations
ProdataKey
ProdataKey focuses exclusively on access control. By focusing on this core strength, PDK ensures that their system is top-notch. Instead of developing several other in-house products, PDK partners with 3rd-party platforms for integration with video management, system automation, visitor management, and more.
PDK offers robust integration capabilities through its Open API and Mobile SDK, allowing systems to connect seamlessly with a wide range of industry-leading 3rd-party platforms. By utilizing the Open API, integrators can connect essentially any platform to PDK to create fully-customized, end-to-end solutions for their customers. Additionally, one of PDK’s standout strengths is its Integrations page, found on PDK.io, which serves as a marketplace of ready-to-use integrations, which don’t require additional software drivers or extensive set up.
Alarm.com
Contrary to ProdataKey’s approach, Alarm.com’s access solution integrates with the company’s in-house security, monitoring, and automation platform, providing a cohesive security ecosystem. Though this does have favorability for some applications, reports have shown some lack of performance in its video offerings compared to other VMS competitors. Alarm.com also offers an Open API that enables additional integrations with 3rd-party systems, including home automation, energy management, and VMS, though the company prioritizes native integrations.
Conclusion
When it comes to ProdataKey vs. Alarm.com, both offer powerful access control solutions, though they take on distinct approaches to the market. PDK is ideal for SMBs, residential properties, and enterprise operations looking for a flexible solution with sophisticated features. On the other hand, Alarm.com may be a solution well-suited for customers who seek a natively integrated security, video, and home automation solution. Ultimately, the choice between the two manufacturers depends on specific needs, budget, and integration requirements, though PDK certainly stands out for its value-driven solutions and mobile-first approach.
